Choose a license #25

Open
opened 2026-03-15 22:55:43 +01:00 by rayyan-parkar · 2 comments
rayyan-parkar commented 2026-03-15 22:55:43 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)
No description provided.
Owner

I am in favor of us using GPLv3 as our license. I feel like it fits well with our goals. We want Echelon to be open source and allow people to use this as a base to make something better, but it should remain open source.

I did look a bit into dual licensing for companies (AGPLv3 for normal use + commercial license for companies) but it is a more fragile setup since we would need to figure out how other open source contributions fit into this.

For this reason I prefer us to just be GPLv3 for now.

I am in favor of us using GPLv3 as our license. I feel like it fits well with our goals. We want Echelon to be open source and allow people to use this as a base to make something better, but it should remain open source. I did look a bit into dual licensing for companies (AGPLv3 for normal use + commercial license for companies) but it is a more fragile setup since we would need to figure out how other open source contributions fit into this. For this reason I prefer us to just be GPLv3 for now.
Owner

Seconded, I definitely agree, AGPLv3 feels a bit too aggressive imo.

Seconded, I definitely agree, AGPLv3 feels a bit too aggressive imo.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
streigen/echelon#25
No description provided.